Home Security Monitoring

Posts Tagged ‘US’

Then why doesn’t Obama propose raising money for his plans by limiting the home mortgage deduction to the amount it exceeds 7.5 % of a persons income( the current threshold for medical deductions)? Why doesn’t he propose to make health costs fully deductible for those that itemize? And for those that don’t have a special box on the 1040 & EZ. This box would be the deduction for the amount paid for a private healthcare policy (defined by the government as a basic plan). The companies that could give the best rates would get the most business. Why can’t the government define a basic policy? They define the minimum car insurance I need to carry?
Are is a power grab more important? If passed into law, what will be the anticipated date that these government subsidy/ rebate taxes paid back to taxpayer plans will go broke in the same fashion that medicare, medicaid, and social security are anticipated to run out of money and need more tax dollars from EVERYONE?
medicare is not efficient with the same outcomes – at the present time there are restrictions in medicare eligible care that you can get if you have private insurance. Medicare accounts for 40% of all US health spending yet covers far less than 40% of the US population. When they say they are going to reduce medicare costs they do it by reducing the amount the reimburse providers (leaving disadvantaged patients to pick up the difference & more providers opting out of providing Medicare services increasing the stress on heavily regulated hospitals.
Advances in medicine are available more widely and sooner in the US than anywhere else and most come from the US.
Part of the problem is the legal system which encourages and allows patients hit the lottery. Depending on the specialty it is possible for 30-45% of a Drs salary to go to malpractice insurance. That money has to come from somewhere and many Drs leave the field when able rather than tolerate it.

It Is Time to Take Home Security Seriously

Wireless Burglar Alarms

If you look at crime levels, you’ll notice that the numbers are increasing and don’t show any evidence of slowing down at all. Unemployment numbers are high and getting higher, the economy is sputtering, and with that crime will only continue to rise. Knowing what to do about it and how to best protect your family is critical. There are many types of residential alarm systems with the wireless burglar alarms becoming more and more popular all the time. Wireless home alarms systems are easy to install and maintenance is usually no more than replacing batteries regularly to ensure a strong signal.

The latest crime stats are, to put it softly, quite disturbing. Crime in US accounts for more death, injuries and loss of property then all Natural Disasters mixed. According to FBI statistical data a theft happens in the US each 15 seconds. On top of this the victims and their relations often experience finance issues, and time is typically lost from work to handle the legal, insurance and private issues related to being a victim. In the 80′s when crack cocaine hit the streets crime rose a median of twenty-six percent in most major towns. Now, a major contributor to home intrusions is the drug Methamphetamine. Robbery and thefts from car’s are the most prevalent neighborhood crimes.

Often break ing into an auto gives the thief a bonus, access to the RC permitting the house’s garage door to be opened. Most home intrusions occur during daylight hours while owners are away. While home robbery is an example of the most straightforward crimes to commit, it is also one of the most straightforward to stop. Most police departments are unusual supportive of these programs and will supply data and materials on the way to line up a program. Members keep a keep an eye open for their neighbors and report suspicious activities to the police department. A term used regularly in these groups is hardening the target.

Toughening the target means steps you can take to lead to a thief to go round your place and move on to a faster target. The bulk of the safety items debated are relatively inexpensive trails to harden your target. Also, many high tech devices once considered cost prohibitive are now reasonable. As an example, a wireless video surveillance system can be purchase for around $50.00 add a little more and get wireless burglar alarms for your whole home. Just mount the small camera in the area to be viewed and view the image on a channel on your place TV set. Complicated systems, however, can still be pricey. Consider installing a residential alarm systems in your home. Homes without a burglar alarm are three times more certain to get broken into than homes with residential alarm systems. A full article might be devoted to this one subject, but lets study the main points. If you are leasing your accommodation, wireless home alarms systems are the best choice as you can take the system with you when you move. Most security execs have a propensity to prefer hardwire, but the negative side is the higher cost because of the installation time worried. Wireless, by the personality of the name, is installed in hours compared to days with hardwired systems.

A negative side has to fret with batteries. At last either system detects an intrusion and sounds an alarm. The alarm may be a local siren or bell, or a silent alarm to a security monitoring company, or both. The safety representative surveying your place can make suggestions for your best protection based often on your living patterns. If you are just living as standard, you are putting your family, and your property at nonessential risk. Home intrusions have gone up to the point where each home-owner must become more aware of the risks, and learn about the newest security products available to guard ones home, family, and property. Guarantee your place is safe and secure. Wireless burglar alarms are a great choice. Burglars hate noise and light so pick a system that provides lots of both and that will greatly help deter a break in at your home.

.

Chemistry

Structure of ethanol molecule. All bonds are single bonds

Glucose (a simple sugar) is created in the plant by photosynthesis.

6 CO2 + 6 H2O + light C6H12O6 + 6 O2

During ethanol fermentation, glucose is decomposed into ethanol and carbon dioxide.

C6H12O6 2 C2H5OH+ 2 CO2 + heat

During combustion ethanol reacts with oxygen to produce carbon dioxide, water, and heat:

C2H5OH + 3 O2 2 CO2 + 3 H2O + heat

After doubling the combustion reaction because two molecules of ethanol are produced for each glucose molecule, and adding all three reactions together, there are equal numbers of each type of molecule on each side of the equation, and the net reaction for the overall production and consumption of ethanol is just:

light heat

The heat of the combustion of ethanol is used to drive the piston in the engine by expanding heated gases. It can be said that sunlight is used to run the engine.

Glucose itself is not the only substance in the plant that is fermented. The simple sugar fructose also undergoes fermentation. Three other compounds in the plant can be fermented after breaking them up by hydrolysis into the glucose or fructose molecules that compose them. Starch and cellulose are molecules that are strings of glucose molecules, and sucrose (ordinary table sugar) is a molecule of glucose bonded to a molecule of fructose. The energy to create fructose in the plant ultimately comes from the metabolism of glucose created by photosynthesis, and so sunlight also provides the energy generated by the fermentation of these other molecules.

Ethanol may also be produced industrially from ethene (ethylene). Addition of water to the double bond converts ethene to ethanol:

CH2=CH2 + H2O CH3CH2OH

This is done in the presence of an acid which catalyzes the reaction, but is not consumed. The ethene is produced from petroleum by steam cracking.

When ethanol is burned in the atmosphere rather than in pure oxygen, other chemical reactions occur with different components of the atmosphere such as N2. This leads to the production of nitrous oxides NOx , a major air pollutant.

Sources

Main article: Energy crop

Sugar cane harvest

Cornfield in South Africa

Switchgrass

Ethanol is a renewable energy source because the energy is generated by using a resource, sunlight, which is naturally replenished. Creation of ethanol starts with photosynthesis causing a feedstock, such as sugar cane or corn, to grow. These feedstocks are processed into ethanol.

About 5% of the ethanol produced in the world in 2003 was actually a petroleum product. It is made by the catalytic hydration of ethylene with sulfuric acid as the catalyst. It can also be obtained via ethylene or acetylene, from calcium carbide, coal, oil gas, and other sources. Two million tons of petroleum-derived ethanol are produced annually. The principal suppliers are plants in the United States, Europe, and South Africa. Petroleum derived ethanol (synthetic ethanol) is chemically identical to bio-ethanol and can be differentiated only by radiocarbon dating.

Bio-ethanol is usually obtained from the conversion of carbon based feedstock. Agricultural feedstocks are considered renewable because they get energy from the sun using photosynthesis, provided that all minerals required for growth (such as nitrogen and phosphorus) are returned to the land. Ethanol can be produced from a variety of feedstocks such as sugar cane, bagasse, miscanthus, sugar beet, sorghum, grain sorghum, switchgrass, barley, hemp, kenaf, potatoes, sweet potatoes, cassava, sunflower, fruit, molasses, corn, stover, grain, wheat, straw, cotton, other biomass, as well as many types of cellulose waste and harvestings, whichever has the best well-to-wheel assessment.

An alternative process to produce bio-ethanol from algae is being developed by the company Algenol. Rather than grow algae and then harvest and ferment it the algae grow in sunlight and produce ethanol directly which is removed without killing the algae. It is claimed the process can produce 6000 gallons per acre per year compared with 400 gallons for corn production.

Currently, the first generation processes for the production of ethanol from corn use only a small part of the corn plant: the corn kernels are taken from the corn plant and only the starch, which represents about 50% of the dry kernel mass, is transformed into ethanol. Two types of second generation processes are under development. The first type uses enzymes and yeast to convert the plant cellulose into ethanol while the second type uses pyrolysis to convert the whole plant to either a liquid bio-oil or a syngas. Second generation processes can also be used with plants such as grasses, wood or agricultural waste material such as straw.

Production process

See also: problems associated with corn-derived ethanol

The basic steps for large scale production of ethanol are: microbial (yeast) fermentation of sugars, distillation, dehydration (requirements vary, see Ethanol fuel mixtures, below), and denaturing (optional). Prior to fermentation, some crops require saccharification or hydrolysis of carbohydrates such as cellulose and starch into sugars. Saccharification of cellulose is called cellulolysis (see cellulosic ethanol). Enzymes are used to convert starch into sugar.

Fermentation

Main article: Ethanol fermentation

Ethanol is produced by microbial fermentation of the sugar. Microbial fermentation will currently only work directly with sugars. Two major components of plants, starch and cellulose, are both made up of sugars, and can in principle be converted to sugars for fermentation. Currently, only the sugar (e.g. sugar cane) and starch (e.g. corn) portions can be economically converted. However, there is much activity in the area of cellulosic ethanol, where the cellulose part of a plant is broken down to sugars and subsequently converted to ethanol.

Distillation

Ethanol plant in West Burlington, Iowa

Ethanol plant in Sertozinho, Brazil.

For the ethanol to be usable as a fuel, water must be removed. Most of the water is removed by distillation, but the purity is limited to 95-96% due to the formation of a low-boiling water-ethanol azeotrope. The 95.6% m/m (96.5% v/v) ethanol, 4.4% m/m (3.5% v/v) water mixture may be used as a fuel alone, but unlike anhydrous ethanol, is immiscible in gasoline, so the water fraction is typically removed in further treatment in order to burn in combination with gasoline in gasoline engines.

Dehydration

There are basically five dehydration processes to remove the water from an azeotropic ethanol/water mixture. The first process, used in many early fuel ethanol plants, is called azeotropic distillation and consists of adding benzene or cyclohexane to the mixture. When these components are added to the mixture, it forms a heterogeneous azeotropic mixture in vapor-liquid-liquid equilibrium, which when distilled produces anhydrous ethanol in the column bottom, and a vapor mixture of water and cyclohexane/benzene. When condensed, this becomes a two-phase liquid mixture. Another early method, called extractive distillation, consists of adding a ternary component which will increase ethanol’s relative volatility. When the ternary mixture is distilled, it will produce anhydrous ethanol on the top stream of the column.

With increasing attention being paid to saving energy, many methods have been proposed that avoid distillation all together for dehydration. Of these methods, a third method has emerged and has been adopted by the majority of modern ethanol plants. This new process uses molecular sieves to remove water from fuel ethanol. In this process, ethanol vapor under pressure passes through a bed of molecular sieve beads. The bead’s pores are sized to allow absorption of water while excluding ethanol. After a period of time, the bed is regenerated under vacuum to remove the absorbed water. Two beds are used so that one is available to absorb water while the other is being regenerated. This dehydration technology can account for energy saving of 3,000 btus/gallon (840 kJ/l) compared to earlier azeotropic distillation.

Technology

Ethanol-based engines

Ethanol is most commonly used to power automobiles, though it may be used to power other vehicles, such as farm tractors, boats and airplanes. Ethanol (E100) consumption in an engine is approximately 51% higher than for gasoline since the energy per unit volume of ethanol is 34% lower than for gasoline. However, the higher compression ratios in an ethanol-only engine allow for increased power output and better fuel economy than could be obtained with lower compression ratios. In general, ethanol-only engines are tuned to give slightly better power and torque output than gasoline-powered engines. In flexible fuel vehicles, the lower compression ratio requires tunings that give the same output when using either gasoline or hydrated ethanol. For maximum use of ethanol’s benefits, a much higher compression ratio should be used, which would render that engine unsuitable for gasoline use. When ethanol fuel availability allows high-compression ethanol-only vehicles to be practical, the fuel efficiency of such engines should be equal to or greater than current gasoline engines. Current high compression ethanol-only engine designs are approximately 20-30% less fuel efficient than their gasoline-only counterparts.

A 2004 MIT study and an earlier paper published by the Society of Automotive Engineers identify a method to exploit the characteristics of fuel ethanol substantially better than mixing it with gasoline. The method presents the possibility of leveraging the use of alcohol to achieve definite improvement over the cost-effectiveness of hybrid electric. The improvement consists of using dual-fuel direct-injection of pure alcohol (or the azeotrope or E85) and gasoline, in any ratio up to 100% of either, in a turbocharged, high compression-ratio, small-displacement engine having performance similar to an engine having twice the displacement. Each fuel is carried separately, with a much smaller tank for alcohol. The high-compression (which increases efficiency) engine will run on ordinary gasoline under low-power cruise conditions. Alcohol is directly injected into the cylinders (and the gasoline injection simultaneously reduced) only when necessary to suppress nock such as when significantly accelerating. Direct cylinder injection raises the already high octane rating of ethanol up to an effective 130. The calculated over-all reduction of gasoline use and CO2 emission is 30%. The consumer cost payback time shows a 4:1 improvement over turbo-diesel and a 5:1 improvement over hybrid. In addition, the problems of water absorption into pre-mixed gasoline (causing phase separation), supply issues of multiple mix ratios and cold-weather starting are avoided.

Ethanol’s higher octane rating allows an increase of an engine’s compression ratio for increased thermal efficiency. In one study, complex engine controls and increased exhaust gas recirculation allowed a compression ratio of 19.5 with fuels ranging from neat ethanol to E50. Thermal efficiency up to approximately that for a diesel was achieved. This would result in the MPG (miles per gallon) of a dedicated ethanol vehicle to be about the same as one burning gasoline.

Since 1989 there have also been ethanol engines based on the diesel principle operating in Sweden. They are used primarily in city buses, but also in distribution trucks and waste collectors. The engines, made by Scania, have a modified compression ratio, and the fuel (known as ED95) used is a mix of 93.6 % ethanol and 3.6 % ignition improver, and 2.8% denaturants. The ignition improver makes it possible for the fuel to ignite in the diesel combustion cycle. It is then also possible to use the energy efficiency of the diesel principle with ethanol. These engines have been used in the United Kingdom by Reading Transport but the use of bioethanol fuel is now being phased out.why

Engine cold start during the winter

The Brazilian 2008 Honda Civic flex-fuel has outside direct access to the secondary reservoir gasoline tank in the front right side, the corresponding fuel filler door is shown by the arrow.

High ethanol blends present a problem to achieve enough vapor pressure for the fuel to evaporate and spark the ignition during cold weather (since ethanol tends to increase fuel enthalpy of vaporization). When vapor pressure is below 45 kPa starting a cold engine becomes difficult. In order to avoid this problem at temperatures below 11 Celsius (59 F), and to reduce ethanol higher emissions during cold weather, both the US and the European markets adopted E85 as the maximum blend to be used in their flexible fuel vehicles, and they are optimized to run at such a blend. At places with harsh cold weather, the ethanol blend in the US has a seasonal reduction to E70 for these very cold regions, though it is still sold as E85. At places where temperatures fall below -12 C (10 F) during the winter, it is recommended to install an engine heater system, both for gasoline and E85 vehicles. Sweden has a similar seasonal reduction, but the ethanol content in the blend is reduced to E75 during the winter months.

Brazilian flex fuel vehicles can operate with ethanol mixtures up to E100, which is hydrous ethanol (with up to 4% water), which causes vapor pressure to drop faster as compared to E85 vehicles. As a result, Brazilian flex vehicles are built with a small secondary gasoline reservoir located near the engine. During a cold start pure gasoline is injected to avoid starting problems at low temperatures. This provision is particularly necessary for users of Brazil’s southern and central regions, where temperatures normally drop below 15 Celsius (59 F) during the winter. An improved flex engine generation was launched in 2009 that eliminates the need for the secondary gas storage tank. In March 2009 Volkswagen do Brasil launched the Polo E-Flex, the first Brazilian flex fuel model without an auxiliary tank for cold start.

Ethanol fuel mixtures

For more details on this topic, see Common ethanol fuel mixtures.

Hydrated ethanol gasoline type C price table for use in Brazil

To avoid engine stall due to “slugs” of water in the fuel lines interrupting fuel flow, the fuel must exist as a single phase. The fraction of water that an ethanol-gasoline fuel can contain without phase separation increases with the percentage of ethanol.. This shows, for example, that E30 can have up to about 2% water. If there is more than about 71% ethanol, the remainder can be any proportion of water or gasoline and phase separation will not occur. However, the fuel mileage declines with increased water content. The increased solubility of water with higher ethanol content permits E30 and hydrated ethanol to be put in the same tank since any combination of them always results in a single phase. Somewhat less water is tolerated at lower temperatures. For E10 it is about 0.5% v/v at 70 F and decreases to about 0.23% v/v at -30 F.

In many countries cars are mandated to run on mixtures of ethanol. Brazil requires cars be suitable for a 25% ethanol blend, and has required various mixtures between 22% and 25% ethanol, since of July 2007 25% is required. The United States allows up to 10% blends, and some states require this (or a smaller amount) in all gasoline sold. Other countries have adopted their own requirements. Beginning with the model year 1999, an increasing number of vehicles in the world are manufactured with engines which can run on any fuel from 0% ethanol up to 100% ethanol without modification. Many cars and light trucks (a class containing minivans, SUVs and pickup trucks) are designed to be flexible-fuel vehicles (also called dual-fuel vehicles). In older model years, their engine systems contained alcohol sensors in the fuel and/or oxygen sensors in the exhaust that provide input to the engine control computer to adjust the fuel injection to achieve stochiometric (no residual fuel or free oxygen in the exhaust) air-to-fuel ratio for any fuel mix. In newer models, the alcohol sensors have been removed, with the computer using only oxygen and airflow sensor feedback to estimate alcohol content. The engine control computer can also adjust (advance) the ignition timing to achieve a higher output without pre-ignition when it predicts that higher alcohol percentages are present in the fuel being burned. This method is backed up by advanced knock sensors – used in most high performance gasoline engines regardless of whether they’re designed to use ethanol or not – that detect pre-ignition and detonation.

Fuel economy

In theory, all fuel-driven vehicles have a fuel economy (measured as miles per US gallon, or liters per 100 km) that is directly proportional to the fuel’s energy content. In reality, there are many other variables that come in to play that affect the performance of a particular fuel in a particular engine. Ethanol contains approx. 34% less energy per unit volume than gasoline, and therefore in theory, burning pure ethanol in a vehicle will result in a 34% reduction in miles per US gallon, given the same fuel economy, compared to burning pure gasoline. Since ethanol has a higher octane rating, the engine can be made more efficient by raising its compression ratio. In fact using a variable turbocharger, the compression ratio can be optimized for the fuel being used, making fuel economy almost constant for any blend. . For E10 (10% ethanol and 90% gasoline), the effect is small (~3%) when compared to conventional gasoline, and even smaller (1-2%) when compared to oxygenated and reformulated blends. However, for E85 (85% ethanol), the effect becomes significant. E85 will produce lower mileage than gasoline, and will require more frequent refueling. Actual performance may vary depending on the vehicle. Based on EPA tests for all 2006 E85 models, the average fuel economy for E85 vehicles resulted 25.56% lower than unleaded gasoline. The EPA-rated mileage of current USA flex-fuel vehicles should be considered when making price comparisons, but it must be noted that E85 is a high performance fuel, with an octane rating of about 104, and should be compared to premium. In one estimate the US retail price for E85 ethanol is 2.62 US dollar per gallon or 3.71 dollar corrected for energy equivalency compared to a gallon of gasoline priced at 3.03 dollar. Brazilian cane ethanol (100%) is priced at 3.88 dollar against 4.91 dollar for E25 (as July 2007).

Consumer production systems

While biodiesel production systems have been marketed to home and business users for many years, commercialized ethanol production systems designed for end-consumer use have lagged in the marketplace. In 2008, two different companies announced home-scale ethanol production systems. The AFS125 Advanced Fuel System from Allard Research and Development is capable of producing both ethanol and biodiesel in one machine, while the E-100 MicroFueler from E-Fuel Corporation is dedicated to ethanol only.

Experience by country

The world’s top ethanol fuel producers in 2008 were the United States with 9.0 billion U.S. liquid gallons (bg) and Brazil (6.47 bg), accounting for 89% of world production of 17.33 billion US gallons (65.6 million liters). Strong incentives, coupled with other industry development initiatives, are giving rise to fledgling ethanol industries in countries such as Canada, China, Thailand, Colombia, India, Australia, and some Central American countries. Nevertheless, ethanol has yet to make a dent in world oil consumption of approximately 4000 million tonnes/yr (84 million barrels/day) in 2006.

Total Annual Ethanol Production (All Grades)

by Country (2004-2006)

Top 15 countries

(Millions of U.S. liquid gallons per year)

Annual Fuel Ethanol Production

by Country (2007-2008)

Top 15 countries/blocks

(Millions of U.S. liquid gallons per year)

World

rank

Country

2006

2005

2004

World

rank

Country/Region

2008

2007

1

 United States

4,855

4,264

3,535

1

 United States

9,000.0

6,498.6

2

 Brazil

4,491

4,227

3,989

2

 Brazil

6,472.2

5,019.2

3

 China

1,017

1,004

964

3

 European Union

733.6

570.3

4

 India

502

449

462

4

 China

501.9

486.0

5

 France

251

240

219

5

 Canada

237.7

211.3

6

 Germany

202

114

71

6

 Thailand

89.8

79.2

7

 Russia

171

198

198

7

 Colombia

79.3

74.9

8

 Canada

153

61

61

8

 India

66.0

52.8

9

 Spain

122

93

79

9

Central America

n/a

39.6

10

 South Africa

102

103

110

10

 Australia

26.4

26.4

11

 Thailand

93

79

74

11

 Turkey

n/a

15.8

12

 United Kingdom

74

92

106

12

 Pakistan

n/a

9.2

13

 Ukraine

71

65

66

13

 Peru

n/a

7.9

14

 Poland

66

58

53

14

 Argentina

n/a

5.2

15

 Saudi Arabia

52

32

79

15

 Paraguay

n/a

4.7

World Total

13,489

12,150

10,770

World Total

17,335.29

13,101.7

Brazil

Main articles: Ethanol fuel in Brazil and History of ethanol fuel in Brazil

Brazil has ethanol fuel available throughout the country. A typical Petrobras filling station at So Paulo with dual fuel service, marked A for alcohol (ethanol) and G for gasoline.

Typical Brazilian “flex” models from several carmakers, that run on any blend of ethanol and gasoline, from E20-E25 gasohol to E100 ethanol fuel.

The Honda CG 150 Titan Mix was launched in the Brazilian market in 2009 and became the first flex-fuel motorcycle sold in the world.

Brazil has the largest and most successful bio-fuel programs in the world, involving production of ethanol fuel from sugar cane, and it is considered to have the world’s first sustainable biofuels economy. In 2006 Brazilian ethanol provided 18% of the country’s road transport sector fuel consumption needs, and by April 2008, more than 50% of fuel consumption for the gasoline market. As a result of the increasing use of ethanol, together with the exploitation of domestic deep water oil sources, Brazil, which years ago had to import a large share of the petroleum needed for domestic consumption, in 2006 reached complete self-sufficiency in oil supply.

Together, Brazil and the United States lead the industrial world in global ethanol production, accounting together for 70% of the world’s production and nearly 90% of ethanol used for fuel. In 2006 Brazil produced 16.3 billion liters (4.3 billion U.S. liquid gallons), which represents 33.3% of the world’s total ethanol production and 42% of the world’s ethanol used as fuel. Sugar cane plantations cover 3.6 million hectares of land for ethanol production, representing just 1% of Brazil’s arable land, with a productivity of 7,500 liters of ethanol per hectare, as compared with the U.S. maize ethanol productivity of 3,000 liters per hectare.

The ethanol industry in Brazil is more than 30 year-old and even though it is no longer subsidized, production and use of ethanol was stimulated through:

Low-interest loans for the construction of ethanol distilleries

Guaranteed purchase of ethanol by the state-owned oil company at a reasonable price

Retail pricing of neat ethanol so it is competitive if not slightly favorable to the gasoline-ethanol blend

Tax incentives provided during the 1980s to stimulate the purchase of neat ethanol vehicles.

Guaranteed purchase and price regulation were ended some years ago, with relatively positive results. In addition to these other policies, ethanol producers in the state of So Paulo established a research and technology transfer center that has been effective in improving sugar cane and ethanol yields.

There are no longer light vehicles in Brazil running on pure gasoline. Since 1977 the government made mandatory to blend 20% of ethanol (E20) with gasoline (gasohol), requiring just a minor adjustment on regular gasoline motors. Today the mandatory blend is allowed to vary nationwide between 20% to 25% ethanol (E25) and it is used by all regular gasoline vehicles and flexible-fuel vehicles. The Brazilian car manufacturing industry developed flexible-fuel vehicles that can run on any proportion of gasoline and ethanol. Introduced in the market in 2003, these vehicles became a commercial success. By December 2009 the fleet of “flex” cars and light commercial vehicles had reached 9.35 million vehicles, and 183.3 thousand flex-fuel motorcycles. The ethanol-powered and “flex” vehicles, as they are popularly known, are manufactured to tolerate hydrated ethanol (E100), an azeotrope composed of 95.6% ethanol and 4.4% water.

The latest innovation within the Brazilian flexible-fuel technology is the development of flex-fuel motorcycles. The first flex motorcycle was launched to the market by Honda in March 2009. Produced by its Brazilian subsidiary Moto Honda da Amaznia, the CG 150 Titan Mix is sold for around US$2,700. During the first eight months after its market launch the CG 150 Titan Mix has sold 139,059 motorcycles, capturing a 10.6% market share, and ranking second in sales of new motorcycles in the Brazilian market by October 2009.

United States

 United States fuel ethanol

production and imports

(2001-2008)

(Millions of U.S. liquid gallons)

Year

Production

Imports

Demand

2001

1,770

n/a

n/a

2002

2,130

46

2,085

2003

2,800

61

2,900

2004

3,400

161

3,530

2005

3,904

135

4,049

2006

4,855

653

5,377

2007

6,500

450

6,847

2008

9,000

556

9,637

Note: Demand figures includes stocks change

and small exports in 2005

Main article: Ethanol fuel in the United States

The United States produces and consumes more ethanol fuel than any other country in the world. Ethanol use as fuel dates back to Henry Ford, who in 1896 designed his first car, the “Quadricycle” to run on pure ethanol. Then in 1908, he produced the famous Ford Model T capable of running on gasoline, ethanol or a combination of both. Ford continued to advocate for ethanol as fuel even during the prohibition.

Most cars on the road today in the U.S. can run on blends of up to 10% ethanol, and motor vehicle manufacturers already produce vehicles designed to run on much higher ethanol blends. In 2007 Portland, Oregon, became the first city in the United States to require all gasoline sold within city limits to contain at least 10% ethanol. As of January 2008, three states Missouri, Minnesota, and Hawaii require ethanol to be blended with gasoline motor fuel. Many cities also require ethanol blends due to non-attainment of federal air quality goals.

E85 FlexFuel Chevrolet Impala LT 2009, Miami, Florida.

Several motor vehicle manufacturers, including Ford, Chrysler, and GM, sell flexible-fuel vehicles that can use gasoline and ethanol blends ranging from pure gasoline all the way up to 85% ethanol (E85). By mid-2006, there were approximately six million E85-compatible vehicles on U.S. roads.

In the USA there are currently about 1,900 stations distributing ethanol, although most stations are in the corn belt area. One of the debated methods for distribution in the US is using existing oil pipelines, which raises concerns over corrosion. In any case, some companies proposed building a 1,700-mile pipeline to carry ethanol from the Midwest through Central Pennsylvania to New York.

The production of fuel ethanol from corn in the United States is controversial for a few reasons. Production of ethanol from corn is 5 to 6 times less efficient than producing it from sugarcane. Ethanol production from corn is highly dependent upon subsidies and it consumes a food crop to produce fuel. The subsidies paid to fuel blenders and ethanol refineries have often been cited as the reason for driving up the price of corn, and in farmers planting more corn and the conversion of considerable land to corn (maize) production which generally consumes more fertilizers and pesticides than many other land uses. This is at odds with the subsidies actually paid directly to farmers that are designed to take corn land out of production and pay farmers to plant grass and idle the land, often in conjunction with soil conservation programs, in an attempt to boost corn prices. Recent developments with cellulosic ethanol production and commercialization may allay some of these concerns. A theoretically much more efficient way of ethanol production has been suggested to use sugar beets which make about the same amount of ethanol as corn without using the corn food crop especially since sugar beets can grow in less tropical conditions than sugar cane.

Most of the ethanol consumed in the US is in the form of low blends with gasoline up to 10%. Shown a fuel pump in Maryland selling mandatory E10.

On October 2008 the first “biofuels corridor” was officially opened along I-65, a major interstate highway in the central United States. Stretching from northern Indiana to southern Alabama, this corridor consisting of more than 200 individual fueling stations makes it possible to drive a flex-fueled vehicle from Lake Michigan to the Gulf of Mexico without being further than a quarter tank worth of fuel from an E85 pump.

On April 23, 2009, the California Air Resources Board approved the specific rules and carbon intensity reference values for the California Low-Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) that will go into effect in January 1, 2011. During the consultation process there was controversy regarding the inclusion and modeling of indirect land use change effects. After the CARB’s ruling, among other criticisms, representatives of the US ethanol industry complained that this standard overstates the environmental effects of corn ethanol, and also criticized the inclusion of indirect effects of land-use changes as an unfair penalty to domestically produced corn ethanol because deforestation in the developing world is being tied to US ethanol production. The initial reference value set for 2011 for LCFS means that Mid-west corn ethanol will not meet the California standard unless current carbon intensity is reduced.

A similar controversy arose after the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) published on May 5, 2009, its notice of proposed rulemaking for the new Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS). The draft of the regulations was released for public comment during a 60-day period. EPA’s proposed regulations also included the carbon footprint from indirect land-use changes. On the same day, President Barack Obama signed a Presidential Directive with the aim to advance biofuels research and improve their commercialization. The Directive established a Biofuels Interagency Working Group comprise of three agencies, the Department of Agriculture, the Environmental Protection Agency, and the Department of Energy. This group will developed a plan to increase flexible fuel vehicle use and assist in retail marketing efforts. Also they will coordinate infrastructure policies impacting the supply, secure transport, and distribution of biofuels. The group will also come up with policy ideas for increasing investment in next-generation fuels, such as cellulosic ethanol, and for reducing the environmental footprint of growing biofuels crops, particularly corn-based ethanol.

Europe

Production of Bioethanol in the

 European Union (GWh)

No

Country

2005

2006

1

 Germany

978

2,554

2

 Spain

1,796

2,382

3

 France

853

1,482

4

 Sweden

907

830

5

 Italy

47

759

6

 Poland

379

711

7

 Hungary

207

201

8

 Lithuania

47

107

9

 Netherlands

47

89

10

 Czech Republic

0

89

11

 Latvia

71

71

12

 Finland

77

0

27

Total

5,411

9,274

n.a. = not available

Consumption of Bioethanol in the

 European Union (GWh)

No

Country

2005

2006

2007

1

 Germany

1,682

3,544

3,408

2

 France

871

1,719

3,174

3

 Sweden

1,681

1,894

2,113

4

 Spain

1,314

1,332

1,310

5

 Poland

329

611

991

6

 United Kingdom

502

563

907

7

 Bulgaria

-

0

769

8

 Austria

0

0

254

9

 Slovakia

0

4

154

10

 Lithuania

10

64

135

11

 Hungary

28

136

107

12

 Netherlands

0

179

101

13

 Denmark

-

42

70

14

 Ireland

0

13

54

15

 Latvia

5

12

20

16

 Luxembourg

0

0

10

17

 Slovenia

0

2

9

18

 Czech Republic

0

13

2

19

 Italy

59

0

0

20

 Finland

0

10

n.a.

27

EU

6,481

10,138

13,563

The consumption of bioethanol is largest in Europe in Germany, Sweden, France and Spain. Europe produces equivalent to 90% of its consumption (2006). Germany produced ca 70% of its consumption, Spain 60% and Sweden 50% (2006). In Sweden there are 792 E85 filling stations and in France 131 E85 service stations with 550 more under construction.

On Monday, September 17, 2007 the first ethanol fuel pump was opened in Reykjavik, Iceland. This pump is the only one of its kind in Iceland. The fuel is imported by Brimborg, a Volvo dealer, as a pilot to see how ethanol fueled cars work in Iceland.

In The Netherlands regular petrol with no bio-additives is slowly being outphased, since EU-legislation has been passed that requires the fraction of nonmineral origin to become minimum 5.75% of the total fuel consumption volume in 2010. This can be realised by substitutions in diesel or in petrol of any biological source; or fuel sold in the form of pure biofuel. (2007) There are only a few gas stations where E85 is sold, which is an 85% ethanol, 15% petrol mix. Directly neighbouring country Germany is reported to have a much better biofuel infrastructure and offers both E85 and E50. Biofuel is taxed equally as regular fuel. However, fuel tanked abroad cannot be taxed and a recent payment receipt will in most cases suffice to prevent fines if customs check tank contents. (Authorities are aware of high taxation on fuels and cross-border fuel refilling is a well-known practice.)

An example of an ethanol powered bus. This is a Scania OmniCity which has been touring the United Kingdom, which does not use the fuel widely. A larger fleet of similar buses will enter service in Stockholm in 2008.

Sweden

Main article: Ethanol fuel in Sweden

Sweden is the leading country in Europe regarding the use of ethanol as fuel, though it has to import most of the ethanol. All Swedish gas stations are required by an act of parliament to offer at least one alternative fuel, and every fifth car in Stockholm now drives at least partially on alternative fuels, mostly ethanol. The number of bioethanol stations in Europe is highest in Sweden, with 1,200 stations and a fleet of 116 thousand flexi-fuel vehicles as of July 2008.

Stockholm will introduce a fleet of Swedish-made electric hybrid buses in its public transport system on a trial basis in 2008. These buses will use ethanol-powered internal-combustion engines and electric motors. The vehicles diesel engines will use ethanol.

In order to achieve a broader use of biofuels several government incentives were implemented. Ethanol, as the other biofuels, were exempted of both, the CO2 and energy taxes until 2009, resulting in a 30% price reduction at the pump of E85 fuel over gasoline. Furthermore, other demand side incentives for flexifuel vehicle owners include a USD 1,800 bonus to buyers of FFVs, exemption from the Stockholm congestion tax, up to 20% discount on auto insurance, free parking spaces in most of the largest cities, lower annual registration taxes, and a 20% tax reduction for flexifuel company cars. Also, a part of the program, the Swedish Government ruled that 25% of their vehicle purchases (excluding police, fire and ambulance vehicles) must be alternative fuel vehicles.; By the first months of 2008, this package of incentives resulted in sales of flexible-fuel cars representing 25% of new car sales.

Bioethanol stations

 European Union

Country

Stations

No/106

persons

 Sweden

1,200

131.26

 France

211

3.27

 Germany

193

2.35

 Switzerland

40

5.27

 Ireland

29

6.84

 United Kingdom

22

0.36

Asia

China

Main article: Bioenergy in China

China is promoting ethanol-based fuel on a pilot basis in five cities in its central and northeastern region, a move designed to create a new market for its surplus grain and reduce consumption of petroleum. The cities include Zhengzhou, Luoyang and Nanyang in central China’s Henan province, and Harbin and Zhaodong in Heilongjiang province, northeast China. Under the program, Henan will promote ethanol-based fuel across the province by the end of this year. Officials say the move is of great importance in helping to stabilize grain prices, raise farmers’ income and reducing petrol- induced air pollution.

Thailand

Thailand already use 10% ethanol (E10) widely on big scale on the local market. Beginning in 2008 Thailand started with the sale of E20 and by late 2008 E85 flexible fuel vehicles were introduced with only two gas stations selling E85.

Thailand is now converting some of the cassava stock hold by the government into fuel ethanol. Cassava-based ethanol productions are being ramped up to help manage the agricultural outputs of both cassava and sugar cane. With its abundant biomass resources, it is believed that the fuel ethanol program will be a new means of job creation in the rural areas while enhancing the balance sheet of fuel imports.

Australia

Main article: Ethanol fuel in Australia

Legislation in Australia imposes a 10% cap on the concentration of fuel ethanol blends. Blends of 90% unleaded petrol and 10% fuel ethanol are commonly referred to as E10. E10 is available through service stations operating under the BP, Caltex, Shell and United brands as well as those of a number of smaller independents. Not surprisingly, E10 is most widely available closer to the sources of production in Queensland and New South Wales where Sugar Cane is grown. E10 is most commonly blended with 91 RON “regular unleaded” fuel. There is a requirement that retailers label blends containing fuel ethanol on the dispenser.

Due to ethanol’s greater stability under pressure it is used by Shell in their 100 octane fuel. Similarly IFS add 10% ethanol to their 91 octane fuel, label it premium fuel and sell it more cheaply that regular unleaded. This is converse to the general practice of adding ethanol to a lesser quality fuel to bring its octane rating up to 91.

Some concern was raised over the use of ethanol blend fuels in petrol vehicles in 2003, yet manufacturers widely claimed that their vehicles were engined for such fuels. Since then there have been no reports of adverse affects to vehicles running on ethanol blended fuels.

Caribbean Basin

 United States fuel ethanol

imports by country

(2002-2007)

(Millions of U.S. liquid gallons)

Country

2007

2006

2005

2004

2003

2002

 Brazil

188.8

433.7

31.2

90.3

0

0

 Jamaica

75.2

66.8

36.3

36.6

39.3

29.0

 El Salvador

73.3

38.5

23.7

5.7

6.9

4.5

 Trinidad and Tobago

42.7

24.8

10.0

0

0

0

 Costa Rica

39.3

35.9

33.4

25.4

14.7

12.0

All countries in Central America, northern South America and the Caribbean are located in a tropical zone with suitable climate for growing sugar cane. In fact, most of these countries have a long tradition of growing sugar cane mainly for producing sugar and alcoholic beverages.

As a result of the guerilla movements in Central America, in 1983 the United States unilateral and temporarily approved the Caribbean Basin Initiative, allowing most countries in the region to benefit from several tariff and trade benefits. These benefits were made permanent in 1990 and more recently, these benefits were replaced by the Caribbean Basin Trade and Partnership Act, approved in 2000, and the Dominican Republicentral America Free Trade Agreement that went to effect in 2008. All these agreements have allowed several countries in the region to export ethanol to the U.S free of tariffs. Until 2004, the countries that benefited the most were Jamaica and Costa Rica, but as the U.S. began demanding more fuel ethanol, the two countries increased their exports and two others began exporting. In 2007, Jamaica, El Salvador, Trinidad & Tobago and Costa Rica exported together to the U.S. a total of 230.5 million gallons of ethanol, representing 54.1% of U.S. fuel ethanol imports. Brasil began exporting ethanol to the U.S. in 2004 and exported 188.8 million gallons representing 44.3% of U.S. ethanol imports in 2007. The remaining imports that year came from Canada and China.

In March 2007, “ethanol diplomacy” was the focus of President George W. Bush’s Latin American tour, in which he and Brazil’s president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, were seeking to promote the production and use of sugar cane based ethanol throughout Latin America and the Caribbean. The two countries also agreed to share technology and set international standards for biofuels. The Brazilian sugar cane technology transfer would allow several Central American, Caribbean and Andean countries to take advantage of their tariff-free trade agreements to increase or become exporters to the United States in the short-term. Also, in August 2007, Brazil’s President toured Mexico and several countries in Central America and the Caribbean to promote Brazilian ethanol technology. The ethanol alliance between the U.S. and Brazil generated some negative reactions from Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez, and by then Cuba’s President, Fidel Castro, who wrote that “you will see how many people among the hungry masses of our planet will no longer consume corn.” “Or even worse,” he continued, “by offering financing to poor countries to produce ethanol from corn or any other kind of food, no tree will be left to defend humanity from climate change.”‘ Daniel Ortega, Nicaragua’s President, and one of the preferencial recipients of Brazilian technical aid also voiced critics to the Bush plan, but he vowed support for sugar cane based ethanol during Lula’s visit to Nicaragua.

Colombia

Colombia’s ethanol program began in 2002, based on a law approved in 2001 mandating a mix of 10% ethanol with regular gasoline, and the plan is to gradually reach a 25% blend in twenty-years. Sugar cane-based ethanol production began in 2005, when the law went into effect, and as local production was not enough to supply enough ethanol to the entire country’s fleet, the program was implemented only on cities with more than 500,000 inhabitants, such as Cali, Pereira, and the capital city of Bogot. All of the ethanol production comes from the Department of Valle del Cauca, Colombia’s traditional sugar cane region. Cassava is the second source of ethanol, and potatoes and castor oil are also being studied.

On March 2009 the Colombian government enacted a mandate to introduce E85 flexible-fuel cars. The executive decree applies to all gasoline-powered vehicles with engines smaller than 2.0 liters manufactured, imported, and commercialized in the country beginning in 2012, mandating that 60% of such vehicles must have flex-fuel engines capable of running with gasoline or E85, or any blend of both. By 2014 the mandatory quota is 80% and it will reach 100% by 2016. All vehicles with engines bigger than 2.0 liters must be E85 capable starting in 2013. The decree also mandates that by 2011 all gasoline stations must provide infrastructure to guarantee availability of E85 throughout the country. The mandatory introduction of E85 flex-fuels has been controversial.

Costa Rica

The government, based on the National Biofuel Program, established the mandatory use of all gasoline sold in Costa Rica with a blend of around 7.5% ethanol, starting in October 2008. The implementation phase follows a two year trial that took place in the provinces of Guanacaste and Puntarenas. The government expects to increase the percent of ethanol mixed with gasoline to 12% in the next 4 to 5 years. The Costa Rican government is pursuing this policy to lower the country’s dependency of foreign oil and to reduce the amount of greenhouse gases produced. The plan also calls for an increase in ethanol producing crops and tax breaks for flex-fuel vehicles and other alternative fuel vehicles. However, the introduction of the blend of 7% ethanol was postponed in September 2008 until the beginning of 2009. This delay was due to a request by the national association of fuel retailers to have more time available to adapt their fueling infrastructure. Additional delays caused another postponement, as fueling stations were not ready yet for handling ethanol fuel, and now implementation is expected for November 2009.
Despite the official postponement, during the months of February and March 2009, ethanol in different blends was sold without warning to consumers, which was cause for complains. The national distribution company, RECOPE, explained that it had already bought 50,000 barrels of ethanol stored and ready for distribution, so it decided to used as an oxygenate in substitution of MTBE. Nevertheless, retail sales of E7 continue uninterrupted in the trial regions of Guanacaste and the Central Pacific for three years now.

El Salvador

As a result of the cooperation agreement between the United States and Brazil, El Salvador was chosen in 2007 to lead a pilot experience to introduce state-of-the-art technology for growing sugar cane for production of ethanol fuel in Central America, as this technical bilateral cooperation is looking for helping Central American countries to reduce their dependence on foreign oil.

Comparison of Brazil and the U.S.

Evolution of the ethanol productivity per hectare of sugarcane planted in Brazil between 1975 and 2004. Source: Goldemberg (2008).

Brazil’s sugar cane-based industry is far more efficient than the U.S. corn-based industry. Brazilian distillers are able to produce ethanol for 22 cents per liter, compared with the 30 cents per liter for corn-based ethanol. Sugarcane cultivation requires a tropical or subtropical climate, with a minimum of 600 mm (24 in) of annual rainfall. Sugarcane is one of the most efficient photosynthesizers in the plant kingdom, able to convert up to 2% of incident solar energy into biomass. Ethanol is produced by yeast fermentation of the sugar extracted from sugar cane.

Sugarcane production in the United States occurs in Florida, Louisiana, Hawaii, and Texas. In prime growing regions, such as Hawaii, sugarcane can produce 20 kg for each square meter exposed to the sun. The first three plants to produce sugar cane-based ethanol are expected to go online in Louisiana by mid 2009. Sugar mill plants in Lacassine, St. James and Bunkie were converted to sugar cane-based ethanol production using Colombian technology in order to make possible a profitable ethanol production. These three plants will produce 100 million gallons of ethanol within five years.

U.S. corn-derived ethanol costs 30% more because the corn starch must first be converted to sugar before being distilled into alcohol. Despite this cost differential in production, in contrast to Japan and Sweden, the U.S. does not import much of Brazilian ethanol because of U.S. trade barriers corresponding to a tariff of 54-cent per gallon a levy designed to offset the 45-cent per gallon blender’s federal tax credit that is applied to ethanol no matter its country of origin. One advantage U.S. corn-derived ethanol offers is the ability to return 1/3 of the feedstock back into the market as a replacement for the corn used in the form of Distillers Dried Grain.

Comparison of key characteristics between

the ethanol industries in the United States and Brazil

Characteristic

 Brazil

 U.S.

Units/comments

Feedstock

Sugar cane

Maize

Main cash crop for ethanol production, the US has less than 2% from other crops.

Total ethanol fuel production (2008)
6,472

9,000

Million U.S. liquid gallons

Total arable land
355

270(1)

Million hectares.

Total area used for ethanol crop (2006)

3.6 (1%)

10 (3.7%)

Million hectares (% total arable)

Productivity per hectare
6,800-8,000

3,800-4,000

Liters of ethanol per hectare. Brazil is 727 to 870 gal/acre (2006), US is 321 to 424 gal/acre (2003)

Energy balance (input energy productivity)
8.3 to 10.2

1.3 to 1.6

Ratio of the energy obtained from ethanol/energy expended in its production

Estimated GHG emissions reduction
86-90%(2)

10-30%(2)

% GHGs avoided by using ethanol instead of gasoline, using existing crop land (No ILUC).

Full life-cycle carbon intensity

73.40

105.10(3)

Grams of CO2 equivalent released per MJ of energy produced, includes indirect land use changes.

Estimated payback time for GHG emissions

17 years(4)

93 years(4)

Brazilian cerrado for sugarcane and US grassland for corn. Land use change scenarios by Fargione

Flexible-fuel vehicle fleet

9.3 million

8.0 million

Autos and light trucks only. Brazil as of December 2009 (E100 FFVs). U.S. as of early 2009 (E85 FFVs).

Ethanol fueling stations in the country

35,017 (100%)

2,113(1%)

As % of total gas stations in the country. Brazil by December 2007. U.S. by January 2010. (170,000 total.)

Ethanol’s share in the gasoline market

50%(5)

4%

As % of total consumption on a volumetric basis. Brazil as of April 2008. US as of December 2006.

Cost of production (USD/gallon)
0.83

1.14

2006/2007 for Brazil (22/liter), 2004 for U.S. (35/liter)

Government subsidy (in USD)

0 (6)

0.45/gallon

U.S. since 2009-01-01 as a tax credit. Brazilian ethanol production is no longer subsidized.(6)

Import tariffs (in USD)

20% (FOB)

0.54/gallon

Brazil does not import ethanol fuel since 2002. The U.S. does in a regular basis.

Notes: (1) Only contiguous U.S., excludes Alaska. (2) Assuming no land use change. (3) CARB estimate for Midwest corn ethanol. California’s gasoline carbon intensity is 95.86 blended with 10% ethanol. (4) Assuming direct land use change. (5) If diesel-powered vehicles are included and due to ethanol’s lower energy content by volume, bioethanol represented 16.9% of the road sector energy consumption in 2007. (6) Brazilian ethanol production is no longer subsidized, but gasoline is heavily taxed favoring ethanol fuel consumption (~54% tax). By the end of July 2008, when oil prices were close to its latest peak and the Brazilian Real exchange rate to the US dollar was close to its most recent minimum, the average gasoline retail price at the pump in Brazil was USD 6.00 per gallon, while the average US price was USD 3.98 per gallon. The latest gas retail price increase in Brazil occurred in late 2005, when oil price was at USD 60 per barrel.

Environment

Energy balance

Energy balance
Country

Type

Energy balance

 United States

Corn ethanol

1.3

 Brazil

Sugarcane ethanol

8

 Germany

Biodiesel

2.5

 United States

Cellulosic ethanol

236

experimental, not in commercial production

depending on production method

Main article: Ethanol fuel energy balance

All biomass goes through at least some of these steps: it needs to be grown, collected, dried, fermented, and burned. All of these steps require resources and an infrastructure. The total amount of energy input into the process compared to the energy released by burning the resulting ethanol fuel is known as the energy balance (or “Net energy gain”). Figures compiled in a 2007 by National Geographic Magazine point to modest results for corn ethanol produced in the US: one unit of fossil-fuel energy is required to create 1.3 energy units from the resulting ethanol. The energy balance for sugarcane ethanol produced in Brazil is more favorable, 1:8. Energy balance estimates are not easily produced, thus numerous such reports have been generated that are contradictory. For instance, a separate survey reports that production of ethanol from sugarcane, which requires a tropical climate to grow productively, returns from 8 to 9 units of energy for each unit expended, as compared to corn which only returns about 1.34 units of fuel energy for each unit of energy expended.

Carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas, is emitted during fermentation and combustion. However, this is canceled out by the greater uptake of carbon dioxide by the plants as they grow to produce the biomass. When compared to gasoline, depending on the production method, ethanol releases less greenhouse gases.

Air pollution

Compared with conventional unleaded gasoline, ethanol is a particulate-free burning fuel source that combusts with oxygen to form carbon dioxide, water and aldehydes. Gasoline produces 2.44 CO2 equivalent kg/l and ethanol 1.94 (this is 21% less CO2)[citation needed]. The Clean Air Act requires the addition of oxygenates to reduce carbon monoxide emissions in the United States. The additive MTBE is currently being phased out due to ground water contamination, hence ethanol becomes an attractive alternative additive. Current production methods include air pollution from the manufacturer of macronutrient fertilizers such as ammonia.

A study by atmospheric scientists at Stanford University found that E85 fuel would increase the risk of air pollution deaths relative to gasoline by 9% in Los Angeles, USA: a very large, urban, car-based metropolis that is a worst case scenario. Ozone levels are significantly increased, thereby increasing photochemical smog and aggravating medical problems such as asthma.

Manufacture

In 2002, monitoring the process of ethanol production from corn revealed that they released VOCs (volatile organic compounds) at a higher rate than had previously been disclosed. The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) subsequently reached settlement with Archer Daniels Midland and Cargill, two of the largest producers of ethanol, to reduce emission of these VOCs. VOCs are produced when fermented corn mash is dried for sale as a supplement for livestock feed. Devices known as thermal oxidizers or catalytic oxidizers can be attached to the plants to burn off the hazardous gases.

Carbon dioxide

See also: Low-carbon fuel standard

UK government calculation of carbon intensity of corn bioethanol grown in the US and burnt in the UK.

Graph of UK figures for the carbon intensity of bioethanol and fossil fuels. This graph assumes that all bioethanols are burnt in their country of origin and that previously existing cropland is used to grow the feedstock.

The calculation of exactly how much carbon dioxide is produced in the manufacture of bioethanol is a complex and inexact process, and is highly dependent on the method by which the ethanol is produced and the assumptions made in the calculation. A calculation should include:

The cost of growing the feedstock

The cost of transporting the feedstock to the factory

The cost of processing the feedstock into bioethanol

Such a calculation may or may not consider the following effects:

The cost of the change in land use of the area where the fuel feedstock is grown.

The cost of transportation of the bioethanol from the factory to its point of use

The efficiency of the bioethanol compared with standard gasoline

The amount of Carbon Dioxide produced at the tail pipe.

The benefits due to the production of useful bi-products, such as cattle feed or electricity.

The graph on the right shows figures calculated by the UK government for the purposes of the Renewable transport fuel obligation.

The January 2006 Science article from UC Berkeley’s ERG, estimated reduction from corn ethanol in GHG to be 13% after reviewing a large number of studies. However, in a correction to that article released shortly after publication, they reduce the estimated value to 7.4%. A National Geographic Magazine overview article (2007) puts the figures at 22% less CO2 emissions in production and use for corn ethanol compared to gasoline and a 56% reduction for cane ethanol. Carmaker Ford reports a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions with bioethanol compared to petrol for one of their flexible-fuel vehicles.

An additional complication is that production requires tilling new soil which produces a one-off release of GHG that it can take decades or centuries of production reductions in GHG emissions to equalize. As an example, converting grass lands to corn production for ethanol takes about a century of annual savings to make up for the GHG released from the initial tilling.

Change in land use

See also: Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels

Large-scale farming is necessary to produce agricultural alcohol and this requires substantial amounts of cultivated land. University of Minnesota researchers report that if all corn grown in the U.S. were used to make ethanol it would displace 12% of current U.S. gasoline consumption. There are claims that land for ethanol production is acquired through deforestation, while others have observed that areas currently supporting forests are usually not suitable for growing crops. In any case, farming may involve a decline in soil fertility due to reduction of organic matter, a decrease in water availability and quality, an increase in the use of pesticides and fertilizers, and potential dislocation of local communities. However, new technology enables farmers and processors to increasingly produce the same output using less inputs.

Cellulosic ethanol production is a new approach which may alleviate land use and related concerns. Cellulosic ethanol can be produced from any plant material, potentially doubling yields, in an effort to minimize conflict between food needs vs. fuel needs. Instead of utilizing only the starch by-products from grinding wheat and other crops, cellulosic ethanol production maximizes the use of all plant materials, including gluten. This approach would have a smaller carbon footprint because the amount of energy-intensive fertilisers and fungicides remain the same for higher output of usable material. The technology for producing cellulosic ethanol is currently in the commercialization stage.

Many analysts suggest that, whichever ethanol fuel production strategy is used, fuel conservation efforts are also needed to make a large impact on reducing petroleum fuel use.

Using Ethanol for Electricity

Converting biomass to electricity for charging electric vehicles may be a more “climate-friendly” transportation option than using biomass to produce ethanol fuel, according to an analysis published in Science in May. “You make more efficient use of the land and more efficient use of the plant biomass by making electricity rather than ethanol,” said Elliott Campbell, an environmental scientist at the University of California at Merced, who led the research. “It’s another reason that, rather than race to liquid biofuels, we should consider other uses of bio-resources.”

For bioenergy to become a widespread climate solution, however, technological breakthroughs are necessary, analysts say. Researchers continue to search for more cost-effective developments in both cellulosic ethanol and advanced vehicle batteries.

Health Costs of Ethanol Emissions

For each billion ethanol-equivalent gallons of fuel produced and combusted in the US, the combined climate-change and health costs are $469 million for gasoline, $472952 million for corn ethanol depending on biorefinery heat source (natural gas, corn stover, or coal) and technology, but only $123208 million for cellulosic ethanol depending on feedstock (prairie biomass, Miscanthus, corn stover, or switchgrass).

Efficiency of common crops

As ethanol yields improve or different feedstocks are introduced, ethanol production may become more economically feasible in the US. Currently, research on improving ethanol yields from each unit of corn is underway using biotechnology. Also, as long as oil prices remain high, the economical use of other feedstocks, such as cellulose, become viable. By-products such as straw or wood chips can be converted to ethanol. Fast growing species like switchgrass can be grown on land not suitable for other cash crops and yield high levels of ethanol per unit area.

Crop

Annual yield (Liters/hectare)

Annual yield (US gal/acre)

Greenhouse-gas savings (% vs. petrol)(1)

Comments

Miscanthus

7300

780

3773

Low-input perennial grass. Ethanol production depends on development of cellulosic technology.

Switchgrass

31007600

330810

3773

Low-input perennial grass. Ethanol production depends on development of cellulosic technology. Breeding efforts underway to increase yields. Higher biomass production possible with mixed species of perennial grasses.

Poplar

37006000

400640

51100

Fast-growing tree. Ethanol production depends on development of cellulosic technology. Completion of genomic sequencing project will aid breeding efforts to increase yields.

Sugar cane

68008000

727870

8796

Long-season annual grass. Used as feedstock for most bioethanol produced in Brazil. Newer processing plants burn residues not used for ethanol to generate electricity. Only grows in tropical and subtropical climates.

Sweet sorghum

25007000

270750

No data

Low-input annual grass. Ethanol production possible using existing technology. Grows in tropical and temperate climates, but highest ethanol yield estimates assume multiple crops per year (only possible in tropical climates). Does not store well.

Corn

31004000

330424

1020

High-input annual grass. Used as feedstock for most bioethanol produced in USA. Only kernels can be processed using available technology; development of commercial cellulosic technology would allow stover to be used and…

Production

In the laboratory, methyl formate can be produced by the condensation reaction of methanol and formic acid, as follows:

HCOOH + CH3OH HCOOCH3 + H2O

Industrial methyl formate, however, is usually produced by the combination of methanol and carbon monoxide (carbonylation) in the presence of a strong base, such as sodium methoxide:

CH3OH + CO HCOOCH3

This process, practised commercially by BASF amongst other companies gives 96 % selectivity towards methyl formate, although can suffer from catalyst sensitivity to water which can commonly be present in the carbon monoxide feedstock, commonly derived from synthesis gas. Very dry carbon monoxide is therefore an essential requirement.

Uses

Methyl formate is used primarily to manufacture formamide, dimethylformamide, and formic acid. Because of its high vapor pressure, it is used for quick-drying finishes. It is also used as an insecticide and to manufacture certain pharmaceuticals. Under the trademark Ecomate, it is now used a a blowing agent for foam insulation, as a replacement for CFC, HCFC, or HFCs, with zero ozone depletion potential and zero global warming potential .

A historical use of methyl formate which sometimes brings it attention was in refrigeration. Before the introduction of less toxic refrigerants, methyl formate was used as an alternative to sulfur dioxide in domestic refrigerators, such as some models of the famous GE Monitor Top. Owners of methyl formate refrigerators should keep in mind that even though they operate below atmospheric pressure, if evidence of a leak develops, they should take measures to avoid exposure to the ether-smelling liquid and vapor.

References

Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2007)

^ Process Economics Reports, Review 88-1-1, Process Economics Program, SRI Consulting, California, 1999

^ W. Couteau, J. Ramioulle, US Patent US4216339

^ United Nations Environment Program Rigid and Flexible Foams Technical Options Committee 2006 Assessment report. http://ozone.unep.org/teap/Reports/FTOC/ftoc_assessment_report06.pdf

External links

NIST Chemistry WebBook: Methyl formate

ChemicalLand21.com entry on METHYL FORMATE

Categories: FormatesHidden categories: Articles lacking sources from November 2007 | All articles lacking sources

<!– @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } –>

Having your elderly parent move in with you requires major adjustments on your part, but a few minor adjustments to your home will enable both you and your parent to feel more secure and at ease. With age, seniors are more prone to household falls and accidents, the following safety proofing measures will decrease the likelihood of mishaps along with your stress level:

Get rid of throw rugs, as they can easily get caught under walkers and result in falls.

Install handrails in areas where they will be of assistance, common areas include around toilets, tubs and showers.

Medical alert buttons, like LifeFone provide instant, caring and compassionate assistance from specifically trained Emergency Care Specialists – 24 hours a day. Investing in one costs less than one dollar a day, and provides a priceless lifeline to security.

Purchase rubber grips for faucets and door knobs, elders with arthritis have a weakened grip and rubber grips allow them to securely grasp and turn knobs.

Replace old appliances with newer ones that turn off automatically: irons, electronic heaters and fans can be hazardous if left on.

Ensure that smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms are functional and have new batteries.

Amplified telephones with enlarged buttons and caller ID help visually or hearing impaired individuals make and receive calls easily.

Heavy cast iron pans are good for cooking, but their weight is hard to manage with age. Consider switching to lighter pans to avoid spills and burns.

Shower chairs make showering safer and easier, and can be purchased at medical supply stores.

Replace flip switches with illuminated light switches, or larger rocker switches throughout the house.

About LifeFone: LifeFone provides personal medical emergency alarm devices that are monitored 24/7 to allow independence, security and fast response at the press of a panic button.

LifeFone has been an innovator in providing security and peace of mind to thousands of people throughout the US and Canada since 1976. Utilizing the latest information technology and our continued commitment to “personal” response, LifeFone is in the forefront of the healthcare communications industry.

• Unique advance 3 wire design bridging the communication problem for houses with multiple / dual phase electricity supply. It is specially designed for houses with a detached garage, multiple level house, or house with electric range, electric cook top, electric dryers, and electric wall oven. These houses are mostly wired in 2 x 110 AC supplies (dual Phase). Dual phase wiring is very common in the kitchen area. ### you don’t have to fumble for the right outlets to communicate.
• The system is expandable. You can buy additional sets & add on to the system. ##Multi-channel allows you to pick a good channel for monitoring + Slide switch for designated station setting
• Security- All conversation travel from outlets to outlets within the one power meter of your own house. No bugging and no eavesdropping.
• We ship TO ALL 50 US states & US PROTECTORATES
• *** Please read Important Buying Guide in the “See More Technical Details” before placing order

Product Description
To know more about us, please click “See All buying options” at the upper right hand corner of the screen. On the 2nd page click on the Intercom Central logo, right above FULFILLMENT BY AMAZON. on the 3rd page, click “See more information about this seller” Our company information is located at the lower right hand corner. __________________________________

** We appologize for the multiple steps before you could get to know us. We don’t control the web pages

InterTalk FM413 Advance 3-prong 3-channel 2 units FM Wireless Power-line Intercom for 110 Volts

A good smoke alarm system can and will help you get timely warning about a fire that has started out, or of the presence of smoke and it can even let you know (in some cases) about the presence of carbon monoxide in your home. However, even though there are numerous options available when it comes to choosing the best smoke alarm system it will pay to look at a product that includes smoke alarm battery backup capability.

Product from Kidde

The Kidde smoke alarm battery backup product is a good choice when it comes to using an effective smoke alarm battery backup system. This is a unit that can also be connected to other Kidde products including heat detectors and they can then all be connected on single wiring networks and so ensures that your home gets maximum protection from smoke and heat.

This smoke alarm battery backup provides backup that allows the smoke alarm to continuously monitor for smoke, carbon monoxide – especially, when a power outage occurs. Another important consideration that needs to be addressed before you put your money down on a good smoke alarm system is the amount of time for which you can get the smoke alarm to continue working even in spite of power outages.

In addition, you need to also look at factors such as ease of installation, performance as well as reliability. At the very least, it is always a good idea to replace the battery after a year of service as this is the maximum expected life of any good smoke alarm battery. Keeping the smoke alarm system battery properly charged ensures that you will get smoke alarm battery backup even during power outages.

According to respected UK Government FireKills campaign people are twice as likely to survive a fire in the home if they have a working fire and smoke alarm system installed in their homes. Even the US National Center for Injury Prevention and Control or NCIPC says that as many as fifty percent (it is believed) of all home fire fatalities in the US happened because the homes did not have fire alarm and smoke alarm systems installed.

Fire alarm monitoring is essential to the safety of everyone; and, also to our property and possessions. Besides installing fire alarm systems in the home it is also equally as important to learn the basic skills that will help you save your and the lives of your family members if, God forbid, something unforeseen should occur – like a fire breaking out.

It is clear that installing a smoke alarm system is essential to proper smoke safety. Equally important is the fact that the fire alarm system needs to be fully operational at all times: choosing products that ensure smoke alarm battery backup is therefore the safest bet and one which everyone should seriously consider.

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), the violent crime rate stood at 454.5 (cases per 100,000 population) in 2008, with the homicide rates at 5.4 and property crime rate at 3,213. Since the US government is taking proactive measures to strengthen homeland security and reduce the crime rate, individuals too, must take requisite steps to aid in this endeavor. The best way to ensure a safe home or vehicle is by installing an ADT alarm system.

Advantages of ADT Alarm System

When the ADT alarm system is triggered, a signal is immediately sent to the monitoring center. The center then verifies on the phone whether the alarm was an emergency. In case it is an emergency situation, they notify the concerned local agency about an alarm call at the address.

The alarms are backed by a powerful monitoring system which has several advantages over the conventional systems:

The alarm systems are monitored 24×7
The systems are monitored by UL-approved centers. ADT invests a considerable amount of time and resources in acquiring approval for reducing chances of service disruption.
The monitoring system utilizes the latest technology for keeping a vigil over forced entries, fire outbreaks, flood, carbon monoxide infiltration and similar critical conditions.
The center utilizes efficient computers and safe communications links, which have multiple back-up systems.
Since each of the centers has a virtual presence, if the connection gets interrupted, another center overtakes the work.
The monitoring centers follow an Internal Disaster Management Program, which provides uninterrupted service even in times of crisis, such as during the aftermath of Hurricane Andrew or recovery from the Murrah Federal Building bomb blast.

ADT Alarm System Monitoring Packages

The company offers three packages along with the ADT alarm system:

Basic package: This package is available at $33.99 and offers services such as

Burglary monitoring
Critical condition
Free equipment worth $850
$99 for installation

Fire/Keyfob Package: This package is available at $35.99 and provides services including,

Burglary monitoring
Fire monitoring
Critical condition
Free equipment worth $850
$99 for installation

Two-Way Voice Package: This package is available at $40.99 and provides services such as:

Burglary monitoring
Fire monitoring
Two-way voice communication facility
Critical condition
Free equipment worth $850
$99 for installation

Extending its services to more than 6 million homes and families and over 100 airports in the United States, ADT is the most respected brand name in the security business.

We reckon some of that is because they have over 130 years of experience in the field and have covered so many significant chapters in their business history since their inception in the mid 1800′s besides innovating and re-inventing themselves to emerge as leaders. Among the most critical moves made by ADT Security Company was the use of electric signal devices for facilitating two-way/interactive communication between clients and personnel at the company in 1880 and introducing the automated security systems during the war-torn years in the US.

These moves paved the way for the current generation home security technology, which is what made the public and government realize ADT as being the single largest provider of electronic surveillance equipment and security support services; with over 6 million client accounts held by them currently, it’s no wonder they are the preferred providers for top-brass in US companies and state bodies.

In fact, the US Federal courthouses and over 70 mid-size and large airports besides nineteen of the 30 busiest airports are granted security by ADT giving them over 80 Security Systems hourly in company strength of 6000+ service technicians and installers at their beck and call.

ADT provides security not only for homes but business owners as well and the widest range of their products and services is advertised in detail on their website; these range from the fundamental burglary protection kit with padlocks and electronic alarm to the more upgraded one consisting of a control panel, keypad, door and window sensors, motion detector, indoor alarm, transformer and power backup for the battery besides window decals and lawn signs.

The more exclusive ADT Home Security package comes with a the above protection equipment system besides cell guard backup, 2way voice speaker station, smoke, flood and CO alarm besides a temperature change detector. In this way, with constant innovations, ADT ensures that no element of additional safety and added security is ever compromised when it comes to ensuring constant monitoring of their clients’ homes and offices – whether or not there is power supply, or even in instances of carbon monoxide danger.

The best part about opting for this top name in US home security services is that ADT has personnel going over to a potential customer’s site for a visit and demonstrating the use and usefulness of their systems – at the convenience of the client. They also guide a customers how to prevent any false alarms from going off.

This is not the only reason for the growing popularity of ADT Home Security Services; they do give regular guarantees and good after-sales services with a full-refund for the customers’ installation and monitoring fees in 6 months of the customer not being completely satisfied and up to $500 compensation to those whose houses have been burgled if the clients’ had insurance deductibles.

Loyal customers of ADT get the natural upgrade to a premium home security package after 2years or if they move to a new home besides a 25% discount on any upgrade they choose; so there is really no reason why this innovative security services company should be less than the best in the US with all its customer centric approach and constant view to improving home and business security packages!

<!– @page { margin: 0.79in } P { margin-bottom: 0.08in } –>

Having your elderly parent move in with you requires major adjustments on your part, but a few minor adjustments to your home will enable both you and your parent to feel more secure and at ease. With age, seniors are more prone to household falls and accidents, the following safety proofing measures will decrease the likelihood of mishaps along with your stress level:

Get rid of throw rugs, as they can easily get caught under walkers and result in falls.

Install handrails in areas where they will be of assistance, common areas include around toilets, tubs and showers.

Medical alert buttons, like LifeFone provide instant, caring and compassionate assistance from specifically trained Emergency Care Specialists – 24 hours a day. Investing in one costs less than one dollar a day, and provides a priceless lifeline to security.

Purchase rubber grips for faucets and door knobs, elders with arthritis have a weakened grip and rubber grips allow them to securely grasp and turn knobs.

Replace old appliances with newer ones that turn off automatically: irons, electronic heaters and fans can be hazardous if left on.

Ensure that smoke detectors and carbon monoxide alarms are functional and have new batteries.

Amplified telephones with enlarged buttons and caller ID help visually or hearing impaired individuals make and receive calls easily.

Heavy cast iron pans are good for cooking, but their weight is hard to manage with age. Consider switching to lighter pans to avoid spills and burns.

Shower chairs make showering safer and easier, and can be purchased at medical supply stores.

Replace flip switches with illuminated light switches, or larger rocker switches throughout the house.

About LifeFone: LifeFone provides personal medical emergency alarm devices that are monitored 24/7 to allow independence, security and fast response at the press of a panic button.

LifeFone has been an innovator in providing security and peace of mind to thousands of people throughout the US and Canada since 1976. Utilizing the latest information technology and our continued commitment to “personal” response, LifeFone is in the forefront of the healthcare communications industry.